|

PETrecycling CZ is non-commercial, independent, free & unsponsored Czech
web portal for funs, communities, administrative, law-makers, politicians,
PET plastic industry etc. in the Czech Republic.
My closing statement read:
"There is only one real effective and incentive method to encourage
environmentally sound collecting of beverage one-way containers and it is
deposit in combination with High-Tech R&D resulted Reverse Vending
Machines! |
|
|
|
|
This certainly hasn’t been the most productive year for the California
State Legislature.Tied up in a
state budget battle that has set a record for lateness, the legislature
failed to address many other important public policy issues this year. And
one important policy area it failed to address was
waste reduction and recycling.
At the end of August, the legislature was
on the verge of passing three historic CAW-sponsored bills that had
already passed key votes in the Senate or Assembly. But the legislature,
caught up in beyond-last-minute budget paralysis, failed to take the bills
up for a final vote.
Those bills would have broken new ground
in our efforts to make California the world leader in waste reduction and
recycling:
- Senate Bill 1625 would have
expanded the Bottle Bill, which now covers only beverage containers, to
also include a refund value on ALL
plastic bottles. This would have been the first time that any
state has expanded a Bottle Bill to include more than beverage
containers. California would recycle at
least 3 BILLION more plastic bottles every year under this
proposal.
- Assembly Bill 2769 would have
put a 25 cent fee on every disposable plastic or paper bag distributed
at large grocery stores and pharmacies. About 80 percent of bags given
out in grocery stores are plastic. Grocery and drug stores hand out
5 BILLION of those plastic bags in California every year.
Producing one plastic bag consumes as much energy as running a 100-watt
light bulb for one to two hours. Putting a fee on the bags has reduced
plastic bag consumption in Ireland by more than 90%, as most people now
bring their own reusable bags to the store. The proceeds from the
25 cent fee would have been used to institute the
toughest-in-the-nation litter clean-up law for carryout bags.
- Senate Bill 1020 would have
required cities and counties to keep at least 75% of their wastes
out of landfills by the year 2020. CAW led the campaign for the
successful Solid Waste Recycling Act in 1989, which required 50% waste
diversion by 2000 -- a goal that was ultimately met. This not only
reduced waste, but also saved taxpayers many millions of dollars in
disposal costs. It’s time to reduce
waste and increase recycling even more!
These new policies would have truly been
key components of our recycling revolution in California.
CAW will be back in the new year with
renewed efforts to convince the legislature to act to expand the Bottle
Bill, put a 25 cent fee on disposable bags and create a 75% waste
reduction law.
|
 |
Mark Murray is the Executive Director
of the environmental group
Californians Against Waste (CAW).
He lobbies for CAW and is
recognized as one of the environmental communities leading experts on
waste prevention and recycling policies. CAW has been actively
involved in the development, negotiation and passage of virtually
every piece of waste reduction and recycling legislation enacted in
California. |
Source:
http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/09/who_killed_recy.html

Archive
in
files section:
> 2007
> 2006
> 2005
> 2004
> 2003
> 2002
> 2001
Archive
in files section
Nové/News:
2007 >
2006 >
2005 >
2004 >
2003 >
2002 >
2001 >
2000
|