|
|
|
|
My closing statement read: "There is only one real effective and incentive method to encourage environmentally sound collecting of beverage one-way containers and it is deposit in combination with High-Tech R&D resulted Reverse Vending Machines! |
|
|
|
|
Zdroj/Source: Bottle Bills in the News |
|
|
HOME |
|
|
In fact, it's really the continuation of a long-standing fight between lawmakers, grocers and bottlers over who should rake in the millions from unclaimed deposits. Those are containers for which people paid the requisite nickel but are never returned for recycling and a refund. But, for the public and for posterity, lawmakers should expand the recycling universe —and approve an amended, improved new bottle bill — because plastic, some non-degradable, is choking our landfills and highways. Plastic recycling is about doing right for the generations to follow ours. It is about looking ahead to a "greener'' New York as much as it is about balancing budgets or fixing the bottom line. Since the original bottle bill went into
effect in 1982, the marketplace has ballooned with designer water
and sports drinks. Unless there is agreement on the environmental purpose, the debate in Albany will devolve again into a fight over dollars. In the past, that has led to the usual two-house partisan stalemate. This year, with Democrats holding both houses, the money — as much as $100 million — could flow to government, with compromise on deposits scuttled along the way. Who would end up paying for that? The
consumer — as left-out merchants pass down costs to their shoppers. Source: http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20090201/OPINION04/902010341/1041/OPINION
files section: 2008 > 2007 > 2006 > 2005 > 2004 > 2003 > 2002 > 2001 Archive in files section Nové/News: 2008 > 2007 > 2006 > 2005 > 2004 > 2003 > 2002 > 2001 > 2000
|
|
| Best View: 1.024x768 resolution with Internet Explorer 4.x or above. | |