|
|
|||||
|
My closing statement read: "There is only one real effective and incentive method to encourage environmentally sound collecting of beverage one-way containers and it is deposit in combination with High-Tech R&D resulted Reverse Vending Machines! |
|||||
|
|||||
|
Zdroj/Source: letsrecycle.com |
|||||
|
HOME |
|||||
|
The 'Litterbugs' study cited overseas experience of deposit schemes as proof that, as well as reducing litter, they helped to boost reuse and recycling rates and promote "virtuous behaviour".
"All report significantly increased recycling rates. Surely a no-brainer, then, to introduce a similar system in the UK, which Ipsos-MORI research for CPRE shows would be supported by around 80% of people." Claiming that the government was "intent" on finding reasons not to introduce deposit schemes in the UK, Mr Bryson added: "The fact of the matter is that the recycling rate in this country, while much improved in recent years, still lags behind many of our European partners and, as we have already established, we are world leaders in litter." Industry concernsThe report acknowledged that there were "industry concerns" about introducing a nationwide deposit scheme in the UK, and in particular it explained: "Many existing and proposed contracts to build recycling facilities for local authorities are based on contractors expecting minimum amounts of material to recycle. "If much of this material were instead diverted back to retailers and suppliers through a deposit scheme, the economics of such arrangements would be undermined, hindering growth of recycling capacity," it added. But, labeling that situation "not insoluble", it said called for the potential of introducing a scheme to be explored "but only as part of a fuller review of waste policy". Deposit schemes have already been mooted in Scotland as part of the country's 'Zero Waste' agenda (see letsrecycle.com story), but their effectiveness was questioned by a Defra research project published in December 2008. The Defra research agreed that they would help to boost recycling rates, but claimed that "alternative schemes could achieve the same or better results at a lower cost", and raised concerns over the cost of the schemes - both to retailers needing to develop storage infrastructure and to householders who could less easily return bottles to get their deposit back. New York StateThe 'Litterbugs' report used the experiences of New York State in the US as proof of the effectiveness of a deposit scheme, claiming that, since the scheme was introduced in legislation in 1983, it had recycled 90 billion containers - equivalent to six billion tonnes of materials - at no cost to local authorities .And, it also said that, by preventing containers from becoming litter, the legislation, which is known as 'the Bottle Bill', had "significantly reduced" demand for landfill space.
files section: 2008 > 2007 > 2006 > 2005 > 2004 > 2003 > 2002 > 2001 Archives in files section Nové/News: 2008 > 2007 > 2006 > 2005 > 2004 > 2003 > 2002 > 2001 > 2000
|
|||||
| Best View: 1.024x768 resolution with Internet Explorer 4.x or above. | |||||