|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My closing statement read: "There is only one real effective and incentive method to encourage environmentally sound collecting of beverage one-way containers and it is deposit in combination with High-Tech R&D resulted Reverse Vending Machines! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Zdroj/Source: EU-Recycling |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After 2008 it is at the discretion of Member States to set targets beyond the minimum required by the Packaging Directive and the UK has made clear that its aim is to continue to improve performance on packaging "waste" because of the environmental benefits this brings. Joan Ruddock said: “Since the introduction of the UK Packaging Regulations packaging recycling has improved significantly, from just 27 percent in 1997 to over 57 percent last year. But there is much more to be done. Further cuts in packaging waste are an essential part of reducing our reliance on landfill and cutting greenhouse gas emissions. The higher targets can also act as a driver to help design out unnecessary packaging in future.” The EU minimum recycling and recovery targets are 55 percent and 60 percent respectively. The Government’s preferred option would increase the recycling target to 55.7 percent in 2008, 56.8 percent in 2009 and 58.4 percent in 2010, and the recovery target to 60.6 percent, 61.8 percent and 63.4 percent in the same years. The target system applies to businesses that handle more than 50 tonnes of packaging a year and with an annual turnover of over £2m. It encourages producers to reduce their packaging levels because this reduces the cost to them of recycling and recovering their waste. Recycling packaging reduces CO2 emissions because less energy is used to extract and process recycled materials than virgin ones, particularly materials like aluminium. As well as the environmental benefits of cutting CO2 emissions and reducing reliance on landfill, the proposals have cost benefits of around £1.1m - the difference between the estimated costs to producers of £7.7m, and carbon savings estimated at £8.8m. The proposals are consistent with the Government’s ‘polluter pays’ principal, and the aims of the new Waste Strategy for England which was published in May. Source: Defra UK Autor: - jk - Related documents on
Defra UK
Related information and actual websites on IP PETRECYCLING.CZ: Most important (today from exactly 1,416 websites in total only) related links on Container Recycling Institute - CRI and on IP PETRECYCLING.CZ are "Top 10 Arguments used against the Bottle Bill," not only from US, but used all over the world, now also in Czech republic in media campaign against deposit - against deposit on single served PET bottles, cans and one-way glass bottles, are as follows:
on the other site, they are innovative Best Advanced Technologies (BAT) in all Scandinavian countries, see also complete menu RETURN, and as basic valid document: known also in US etc., in: The reasons for this hard struggle against deposit are mainly political will & support on passage of the bill. All other attempts are not only ineffective, very expensive and even not environmentally sound advice. files section: 2007 > 2006 > 2005 > 2004 > 2003 > 2002 > 2001Archives in files section Nové/News: 2007 > 2006 > 2005 > 2004 > 2003 > 2002 > 2001 > 2000
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Best View : 800x600 resolution with Internet Explorer 4.x or above. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||