![]() PETrecycling CZ is non-trade, freelance, free of charge, not supported Czech web portal for funs, communities, administratives, law-makers, politicians, PET plastic industry etc. in the Czech Republic. My closing statement read: "There is only one real effective and incentive method to encourage environmentally sound collecting of beverage one-way containers and it is deposit in combination with High-Tech R&D resulted Reverse Vending Machines! |
||||||
|
||||||
|
Zdroj/Source: PETplanet insider, Vol.4, No. 08/2003 - link is now valid for registred only, look for more free websites on main menu in PETplanet Translation © Ing. J. Nezval |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is not necessarily the case for PET. Only a small percentage of the post consumer PET that is collected is recycled back into PET bottles. The rest goes into other quality outlets such as polyester fibres, sheet, and strapping.
Are you still with me? Good, because when I was first confronted with this “fair and equal” distribution rule, I was lost. If you only get half of the benefits, it hardly makes a difference whether you go through the elaborate process of collecting, sorting, washing and reclaiming - to recycle good quality flakes into fibres. Burning the lot is cheaper and almost as energy-efficient. You may as well forget about recycling, and put a match to it! No wonder the Ministry concluded that one-way and two-way PET bottles are ‘ecologically unfavorable’, just like one-way glass bottles. Have we been wrong all along, to put so much effort (and money!) into recycling?
If I’ve lost you now, let me illustrate our dilemma with the biblical
account of the Good Samaritan. Here’s the second part of the story, according to the book of LCA science. The Good Samaritan dies a poor man, like all Samaritans do. An angel opens the door and says, ‘What do you want?’ ‘I have come in peace’, says the Good Samaritan, ‘and I am looking for a resting place’. ‘No you’re not,’ says the angel, ‘you’re just a poor old Samaritan’. ‘But I have been good to people whenever I could. Why would you not let me in?’ ‘Just look at how much good that did to you!’ sneers the angel, eyeing his ragged clothes. ‘The distinguished gentleman whose life you saved – he’s in good health, and resting now inside. He doesn’t want to be disturbed’. If you think that’s sad and unfair, you will understand what happened to PET in the German LCAs. Luckily, the LCA side of this story isn’t over yet. In the ISO standards on LCAs, this dilemma on allocations has been identified, and international rules were set up to overcome this kind of unfair dealing. ISO standards say that on occasions like this, you have to look at the bigger picture. They call it ‘extension of system boundaries’.
Such an undertaking represents a very elaborate piece of work, but it can
be done. That is, if you can afford it. If you then take the ultimate step of justifying the findings by cross-checking them with all relevant economic parameters and subject the outcome to scientific peer review, you end up with the largest LCA ever undertaken on PET. Is it really that serious? It is indeed! We commissioned the IFEU institute in Heidelberg, Germany, to undertake this mammoth task, and a range of companies with a stake in the German PET business have already approached us, expressing their interest in participating. They find our doors wide open, and politicians or public interest groups will notice that the German PET beverage industry speaks with one compelling voice. If you are not yet in and you believe you should be, contact me at info@petcore.org.
For more about LCA and CBA studies (also in English and German): Related links on IP PETrecycling.cz in English only: More articles on IP PETrecycling.cz:
|
||||||
| Best View : 800x600 resolution with Internet Explorer 4.x or above. | ||||||