Obsah/Site Map | Základy/Basics | Co je PET/About PET | Návody/Toolkit | Kontakt/Contact | O nás/About us

O autorovi/Authors CV | Časté otázky/FAQ | Nové/New Websites | Z domova/Domestics | Ze světa/World News

Systémy RPET/RPET | Výrobci/Manufactures | Zpracovatelé/MRF |  Obchod/Purchase | Deformátor/Deformator
WWW odkazy/Usefull links |  Konference/PET Events |  PETplanet | PETCORE |  PETflash | RETURN
PETrecycling CZ je nekomerční, nezávislý, volně přístupný a nikým nesponzorovaný český webportál pro ekonomicky a ekologicky nejvýhodnější využití nápojových PET lahví pro příznivce, společnost a obce, administrativu, legislativce, politiky a PET průmysl v České republice. # # # # # # # PETrecycling CZ is the non-trade, freelance, free of charge, not supported czech web portal for funs, communities, administratives, law-makers, politicians, PET plastic industry etc. in the Czech Republic.
PETrecycling CZ is non-trade, freelance, free of charge, not supported Czech web portal for funs, communities, administratives, law-makers, politicians, PET plastic industry etc. in the Czech Republic.
My closing statement read: "There is only one real effective and incentive method to encourage environmentally sound collecting of beverage one-way containers and it is deposit in combination with High-Tech R&D resulted Reverse Vending Machines!


PET in Germany: Towards sustainable growth (2)

(The Good Samaritan)
Translation in Czech 

Logo PETplanet insider


Zdroj/Source: PETplanet insider, Vol.4, No. 08/2003 - link is now valid for registred only, look for more free websites on main menu in  PETplanet
Translation © Ing. J. Nezval
 


HOME ARCHIV 2003 25.08.2003 PET in Germany - Towards the sustainable growth? (2)
 

 


PETplanet asked Frank Koelewijn, Director General of Petcore, to write a series of three articles on Petcore’s key mission, namely: “ to support the use of PET in the beverage business”. Not surprisingly, he chose to home in on current developments in the German market. Here is his second contribution.


   

PETCORE Director General Mr. Frank Koelewijn

The benefits of one-way PET may be obvious to you, but not necessarily so for the average LCA (Life Cycle Analysis) scientist.

After all, he is not interested in what you tell him about PET: he wants to review, independently, all of the precise details of environmental costs and benefits derived from the whole life cycle of the bottle.

Once all of the data are collected, he allocates costs and benefits in a just and equal manner.

This is what the German Environment Ministry had in mind a few years ago when they commissioned a series of studies on the ecological costs and benefits of most packaging systems on the market. The matter of fair and equal allocation of costs and benefits was pretty straightforward for glass. Glass, when recycled, goes back into glass. Therefore, all costs and benefits are allocated to glass.

This is not necessarily the case for PET. Only a small percentage of the post consumer PET that is collected is recycled back into PET bottles. The rest goes into other quality outlets such as polyester fibres, sheet, and strapping.

Not to worry, says the LCA scientist, there is a solution for everything. In cases like this, half of the recycling benefits are allocated to the material source (PET bottles), the other half to the recycling outlet (mostly polyester fibres).

Are you still with me? Good, because when I was first confronted with this “fair and equal” distribution rule, I was lost.

If you only get half of the benefits, it hardly makes a difference whether you go through the elaborate process of collecting, sorting, washing and reclaiming - to recycle good quality flakes into fibres. Burning the lot is cheaper and almost as energy-efficient.

You may as well forget about recycling, and put a match to it! No wonder the Ministry concluded that one-way and two-way PET bottles are ‘ecologically unfavorable’, just like one-way glass bottles. Have we been wrong all along, to put so much effort (and money!) into recycling?

If I’ve lost you now, let me illustrate our dilemma with the biblical account of the Good Samaritan.
The Good Samaritan, riding his donkey on his way from Jericho to Jerusalem, finds a wealthy gentleman lying in the gutter. The man had been robbed, badly beaten, and was left there to die. The Good Samaritan does not hesitate. He stops, feeds the victim and gives him water. He cares for his wounds, dresses him, and lets him ride on his donkey towards the nearest hospital. There he gives the doctors all the cash he has, and instructs them to take good care of the wounded man.

Here’s the second part of the story, according to the book of LCA science.

The Good Samaritan dies a poor man, like all Samaritans do. An angel opens the door and says, ‘What do you want?’ ‘I have come in peace’, says the Good Samaritan, ‘and I am looking for a resting place’. ‘No you’re not,’ says the angel, ‘you’re just a poor old Samaritan’. ‘But I have been good to people whenever I could. Why would you not let me in?’ ‘Just look at how much good that did to you!’ sneers the angel, eyeing his ragged clothes. ‘The distinguished gentleman whose life you saved – he’s in good health, and resting now inside. He doesn’t want to be disturbed’.

If you think that’s sad and unfair, you will understand what happened to PET in the German LCAs. Luckily, the LCA side of this story isn’t over yet. In the ISO standards on LCAs, this dilemma on allocations has been identified, and international rules were set up to overcome this kind of unfair dealing. ISO standards say that on occasions like this, you have to look at the bigger picture. They call it ‘extension of system boundaries’.

Such an undertaking represents a very elaborate piece of work, but it can be done. That is, if you can afford it.
An LCA with extended system boundaries includes all effects, such as market outlets in a range of products. It is also horrendously expensive, which is why it is hardly ever done.

If you then take the ultimate step of justifying the findings by cross-checking them with all relevant economic parameters and subject the outcome to scientific peer review, you end up with the largest LCA ever undertaken on PET.

Is it really that serious? It is indeed!

We commissioned the IFEU institute in Heidelberg, Germany, to undertake this mammoth task, and a range of companies with a stake in the German PET business have already approached us, expressing their interest in participating. They find our doors wide open, and politicians or public interest groups will notice that the German PET beverage industry speaks with one compelling voice.

If you are not yet in and you believe you should be, contact me at info@petcore.org.


© PETplanet publisher GmbH,
Landhausstr. 4, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany,
info@petpla.net
tel: +49(0)6221-65108-0,
fax: +49(0)6221-65108-28

 

 

For more about LCA and CBA studies (also in English and German):

Related links on IP PETrecycling.cz in English only:

More articles on IP PETrecycling.cz:
Articles in archives: 2007 > 2006 > 2005 > 2004  > 2003 > 2002 > 2001 > 2000

 

  Best View : 800x600 resolution with Internet Explorer 4.x or above.